 |
HR Evaluation and Assessment
|
Helping You Assess the Value and Improve the Effectiveness of Your HR Programs
|
Assessing the value of your HR programs and determining their organizational impact is complex and often leads to inconsistent results. In addition, demonstrating the “bottom-line” impact and efficiency of these programs to senior management often proves elusive. These programs are, however, a vital component of improving company effectiveness and sustain a long-term competitive advantage.
At PDII, we understand the challenges organizations face in today’s competitive environment. Our experience in the development of valid and reliable evaluations can help you:
- Align your HR programs with your organization’s business strategy, structure, and employee needs to give your company a competitive edge
- Improve the effectiveness of your HR programs by providing accurate and unbiased feedback coupled with extensive HR expertise
- Assess the value of the HR program and its impact on the bottom line
- Determine if your HR resources are being invested to obtain the highest return
|
What is Required to Effectively Assess or Evaluate Your HR Programs?
|
To conduct an accurate HR assessment or evaluation that provides meaningful and unbiased information requires:
- Sophisticated research methods and analytical techniques
- In-depth knowledge of HR policies, programs and practices
- An understanding of your industry, organization and unique situation
This is only the first step. Beyond uncovering meaningful information or finding relevant answers, are the additional steps needed to achieve realistic and sustainable change. Organizations face the challenges of motivating senior management to embrace the necessary changes and of achieving employee understanding and commitment.
At PDII, we have worked with numerous organizations and conducted research on change management, enabling us to offer you experience and talent in the art of engaging various stakeholders, helping them take ownership of the programs, and realizing employee commitment to the changes, thereby affecting positive enhancements.
|
Expert Solutions Focused on Your Specific Needs
|
PDII has conducted numerous HR program and department evaluations for such organizations as Xaloy, AT&T, Sara Lee, Grand Rapids Transit Authority, Scanlon Leadership Network, Marsh Inc., Atlantic Automotive, Groendyke Transport, and U.S. Department of Transportation – Urban Mass Transit.
|
Articles Authored or Coauthored by PDII Consultants Highlighting PDII’s Approach to the Design and Evaluation of HR Programs
|
|
Increasing Company Competitiveness: “Tuning-up” Your Pay System
|
| |
Published in the WorldatWork Journal
|
| |
The economic shocks and tech bubble of the 1990’s have triggered several new company pay programs and have distorted the alignment of others. This article provides a framework for examining and readjusting your pay plan to better meet company strategic goals, employee needs, and labor market realities.
|
|
Rewarding Good Attendance: A Comparative Study of Positive Ways to Reduce Absenteeism
|
| |
Published in the Personnel Administrator
(Yoder-Heneman Research Award for Research Excellence)
|
| |
High levels of absenteeism were a costly problem for MB Management Corporation. A two-year experiment was initiated to determine the most cost effective method to improve attendance, i.e., financial incentives, lottery program, recognition, or feedback at six manufacturing plants with over 1,200 employees. Although all methods created a reduction in absenteeism, the recognition program was the most effective with decreases ranging from 29% to 52% for each quarter’s baseline assessment, and significant decreases when the control groups demonstrated no changes. Employees also had favorable perceptions of the public recognition program.
|
|
Teams: Why Some Succeed and Others Fail
|
| |
Published in the HR Magazine
(Yoder-Heneman Research Award for Research Excellence)
|
| |
The introduction of teams at 20 manufacturing facilities had substantially increased productivity for a Fortune 100 company. However, management noted that some teams were far more productive than others. These studies examined why some teams out performed others based on data from 122 teams. The findings indicated that team performance is related to attractiveness of performance, agreement with team goals, team goal level, willingness to use cross-training, perceived participation, team efficiency and team commitment.
|
|
Building a Company Culture that Drives Performance: A Case Study
|
| |
Published in the WorldatWork Journal
|
| |
Based on extensive quality and productivity problems, Atlantic Automotive management team realized it needed to create a new organizational structure, reward system, and culture to survive. After an intensive search, the Scanlon Principles and Processes were identified as the means for building a highly competitive organization. Management attributes increased company performance, employee involvement, and employee competence to this plan. On average, each employee has received $1,000 as their share of the performance improvement and company owners have received a better return of investment (ROI).
|
|
In the Hands of Employees
|
| |
Published in WorkSpan
|
| |
With the recent controversy surrounding employee ownership, one company has held fast to the same rule for nearly 50 years: Keep it simple, and keep it in the employee’s hands. This employee ownership program has resulted in big payoffs for company owners and employees.
|
|
The Causal Relationship Between Trust and the Assessed Value of Management by Objectives
|
| |
Published in Journal of Management
|
| |
In an extensive one study of management improvement techniques, trust was found to have a substantial impact on employee and supervisor relationships as it related to the use of goal setting (MBO). In subsequent, research trust was found to be influenced by age, gender, and race of employees and supervisors.
|
|
Learn More about HR Programs that Dow Scott, Ph.D. Has Evaluated and Published with Permission of the Companies Involved:
|
Teams
Scanlon Process & Gainsharing
Merit and Incentive Pay
Trust
Employee Absenteeism
|
 |